Friend Charged with Giving Alcohol to Underage Pittsburgh Pirates Fan Before 21-Foot Fall from Outfield WallNew Foto - Friend Charged with Giving Alcohol to Underage Pittsburgh Pirates Fan Before 21-Foot Fall from Outfield Wall

Joe Sargent/Getty A 21-year-old man has been charged with providing alcohol to the underage Pirates fan who fell on the field on April 30 Authorities say security footage shows the man purchasing two tall cans of beer Kavan Markwood, the fan who fell, sustained injuries to his skull, brain, spine, both sides of his ribs and his lungs A 21-year-old has been charged with supplying alcohol to theunderage Pirates fanwhofell onto the fieldat PNC Park last month. According to court documents obtained and reviewed by PEOPLE, Ethan Kirkwood is being charged with two misdemeanor counts of furnishing liquor to a minor just beforeKavan Markwood's fallover the top of a 21-foot outfield wallon April 30. Authorities also claim security video shows Kirkwood purchasing two 24-ounce cans of beer around the start of the Pirates game, according toABCandCBS, and additional footage shows both Kirkwood and Markwood holding the beers during the game. Kirkwood is also apparently seen on surveillance video returning to the bar at PNC Park to purchase two more beers before Markwood's fall onto the field. GoFundMe As he was being questioned by authorities about the incident, Kirkwood admitted to purchasing alcohol for Markwood before the fall, the complaint alleges, according to ABC and CBS. Kirkwood will return to court for a preliminary hearing in the case on June 23. Markwood's fall occurred in the seventh inning of the Pirates win over the Chicago Cubs on April 30.In videos of the incident, Markwood appeared to lean over the railing while cheering for the Pirates after they hit a double and proceeded to fall 21 feet down onto the field. Allegheny General Hospital Chief Medical Officer Dr. Al Philp gave an update on Markwood's condition on May 7, confirming the baseball fan sustained injuries to his skull, brain, spine, both sides of his ribs and his lungs, according toCBS Pittsburgh. Although Philp noted that it will take time for Markwood to heal, he said he has "progressed really, really well." Never miss a story — sign up forPEOPLE's free daily newsletterto stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from juicy celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. "He's at a point now where he's off the breathing machine, he's out of the intensive care unit, and he's preparing to move to the next step, which will be physical therapy rehab. Seeing him recover so quickly has really been gratifying, frankly, ahead of schedule from what we would have anticipated given the real severity of his injuries," Philp continued. Markwood gave his first interviewto thePittsburgh Tribune-Reviewon May 7, where he said he felt "alright," but also like he had "broken everything." He told the news outlet that he "can't really sleep" and has a "lot of back pain." Read the original article onPeople

Friend Charged with Giving Alcohol to Underage Pittsburgh Pirates Fan Before 21-Foot Fall from Outfield Wall

Friend Charged with Giving Alcohol to Underage Pittsburgh Pirates Fan Before 21-Foot Fall from Outfield Wall Joe Sargent/Getty A 21-year-old...
Did the San Francisco 49ers make a mistake in signing Brock Purdy to $265 million contract extension?New Foto - Did the San Francisco 49ers make a mistake in signing Brock Purdy to $265 million contract extension?

(This article was written with the assistance of Castmagic, an AI tool, and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy. Please reach out to us if you notice any mistakes.) Did the San Francisco 49ers make a mistake in signing Brock Purdy to a massivefive-year, $265 million contract extension, with $181 million guaranteed? That's the question Frank Schwab and Charles Robinson debated onthe latest edition of the "Inside Coverage" podcast. Schwab criticized the extension. He acknowledges that Purdy has earned his contract and that it's a feel-good sports story. However, he doesn't believe the 49ers can win a Super Bowl with Purdy now making $53 million a year. He argues that the team's previous Super Bowl window was due in large part to having a quarterback on a rookie contract — which allowed them to spend more on elite talent around Purdy. "I don't think they could put the pieces around him to replicate what they've done the past few years," Schwab contends. "I think this is the one team that should have leveraged the rookie deal with quarterbacks because I think Kyle Shanahan could find the next Brock Purdy." Schwab is emphatic that head coach Kyle Shanahan "is the cheat code" who is capable of finding and developing another quarterback, and the 49ers lost a big advantage by moving Purdy to a top-tier contract. "They would have won a Super Bowl with Jimmy Garoppolo had the defense done its job on a third-and-long against Patrick Mahomes," Schwab argues. He believes that paying Purdy, who he believes is a mid-tier quarterback, such big money is detrimental and that the team should always be looking for the next cheap rookie contract to build around. Robinson disagrees. He points out that the contract doesnotreset the quarterback market and is actually the seventh-highest QB deal in the league, sitting alongside the likes of Detroit Lions QB Jared Goff. Robinson notes that there are limited alternatives — either teams extend the quarterbacks they know, or they gamble with total uncertainty and risk losing their window with the veterans on their roster. He argues that unless the 49ers want to completely reboot and tank, paying Purdy at his current rate is a reasonable and necessary move. "If you can tell me what a better alternative was, because it wasn't in the draft this year," Robinson presses. "They're not going to have a pick high enough, really, to get an elite player next year." Robinson emphasizes that it's the kind of deal you sign if you have a good, but not necessarily elite, quarterback. From Robinson's perspective, the 49ers made a practical decision consistent with the market for quarterbacks of Purdy's caliber and their current situation as a contending team. He stresses that unless there is a clear, better alternative, extending Purdy at this value was the only realistic path. To hear more NFL discussions, tune intoInside CoverageonApple,SpotifyorYouTube.

Did the San Francisco 49ers make a mistake in signing Brock Purdy to $265 million contract extension?

Did the San Francisco 49ers make a mistake in signing Brock Purdy to $265 million contract extension? (This article was written with the ass...
Van Hollen slams Rubio in contentious exchange over deportations and Abrego GarciaNew Foto - Van Hollen slams Rubio in contentious exchange over deportations and Abrego Garcia

Secretary of State Marco Rubio returned to the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee on Wednesday, appearing before his former colleagues for the first time since his confirmation to defend the president's foreign policy and the administration's budget priorities for the year ahead. Rather than a warm homecoming, Rubio was quickly on defense, with several Senate Democrats pressing the secretary on the State Department's reorganization and spending cuts, as well as Middle East policy and El Salvador detentions. Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., spent much of his allotted time criticizing Rubio on a number of issues, including his coziness with El Salvador's President Nayib Bukele and the Trump administration's failure to "facilitate" in returning Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a migrant who was erroneously deported to El Salvador, to the United States. Abrego Garcia was living in Maryland at the time he was deported. "In the case of El Salvador, absolutely, absolutely, we deported gang members, gang members -- including the one you had a margarita with. And that guy is a human trafficker, and that guy is a gang banger, and that and the evidence is going to be clear," Rubio asserted, referring to Van Hollenmeeting with Abrego Garciain El Salvador in April. MORE: Van Hollen describes dramatic meeting with Abrego Garcia in El Salvador upon return to US "Mr. Chairman, he can't make unsubstantiated comments like that," Van Hollen protested. "Secretary Rubio should take that testimony to the federal court of the United States because he hasn't done it under oath!" Van Hollen has said neither man drank from the glasses that he said officials put on the table during the meeting that appeared to have liquid inside with salt or sugar rims. "No judge and the judicial branch cannot tell me or the president how to conduct foreign policy," Rubio shot back. "No judge can tell me how I have to outreach to a foreign partner or what I need to say to them, and if I do reach that foreign partner and talk to them, I have under no obligation to share that with the judiciary branch. Diplomacy doesn't work that way." "You're just blowing smoke now," Van Hollen said. Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Jim Risch, R-Idaho, had to intervene in the at-times contentious conversation as Van Hollen compared Rubio's policy on deportations and the El Salvador detentions of migrants to the "shameful era" of McCarthy-era witch hunts and the red scare, saying the administration's "campaign of fear and repression is eating away at foundational values of our democracy." "Back then, it took one voice, attorney Joseph Welch, to cut through the hysteria with a simple question that marked the beginning of the end of that shameful era: 'Have you no sense of decency?'" Van Hollen said as he concluded his line of questioning. "And I would ask you the same, Secretary Rubio. You have shown, with your words and your actions what your answer is. I have to tell you directly and personally that I regret voting for you as secretary of state." Van Hollen slams Rubio in contentious exchange over deportations and Abrego Garciaoriginally appeared onabcnews.go.com

Van Hollen slams Rubio in contentious exchange over deportations and Abrego Garcia

Van Hollen slams Rubio in contentious exchange over deportations and Abrego Garcia Secretary of State Marco Rubio returned to the Senate For...
Trump unveils plans for $175B 'Golden Dome' missile defense shieldNew Foto - Trump unveils plans for $175B 'Golden Dome' missile defense shield

President Donald Trump on Tuesday unveiled plans to begin building a sophisticated newmissile defense shieldthat could intercept threats from space, estimating the endeavor would cost some $175 billion and become operational in three years. The project "Golden Dome," which will be led by Space Force Gen. Michael Guetlein, echoes President Ronald Reagan's failed "Star Wars" program, which was criticized for being overly ambitious and siphoning money away from other national priorities. The White House cited advancements in technology as a reason why some of Reagan's vision was now possible. "This design for the Golden Dome will integrate with our existing defense capabilities and should be fully operational before the end of my term," Trump said in announcing the plan. "So we'll have it done in about three years. Once fully constructed, the Golden Dome will be capable of intercepting missiles even if they are launched from other sides of the world and even if they are launched from space." MORE: Iran launches attack on Israel: What is the Iron Dome? Trump began calling for a U.S. missile defense shield similar toIsrael'sIron Dome a year ago on the campaign trail after watching Israel deflect some 300 missiles and drones amid Iran's attacks that spring. Military officials said at the time that they hadn't expressed a need for such a comprehensive shield to defend the U.S., while critics noted the U.S. wasn't under threat from its neighbors, Canada and Mexico, and is buffered by two oceans. Still, some experts say the idea of improving the nation's ability to fend off aerial threats is long overdue. Tom Karako, a missile defense expert, said the current U.S. system is focused mostly on the ability to shoot down intercontinental ballistic missiles from rogue states like North Korea. But the U.S. needs better protection when it comes to other threats like drones, cruise missiles and hypersonic weapons, he said. "The truth is, we're pretty vulnerable," said Karako, director of the Missile Defense Project and a senior fellow with the Defense and Security Department at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. One question, though, is how much capability the U.S. can develop in just three years, particularly considering Trump's stated goal of developing a network of space-based interceptors. "It's not to say that it can't be done sooner than perhaps some folks think, but three years is going to be pushing it for some of those things," Karako said. Standing beside Trump in the Oval Office was Guetlein, the Pentagon's vice chief of space operations who will lead the project, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who said the project was possible now because technology has improved since the Reagan days. "The technology wasn't there. Now it is," Hegseth said of Reagan's "Star Wars" program. "And you're following through to say we will protect the homeland from cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, hypersonic missiles, drones, whether they're conventional or nuclear." On Capitol Hill, early indications were that Republicans would support the effort with Sen. Roger Wicker of Mississippi, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, promising to include a $25 billion "down payment" in an upcoming spending bill. Democrats, though, have questioned the steep price tag. Sen. Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the committee, noted last week the White House requested some $113 billion in its budget for next year without outlining a clear plan on what the program would achieve and when. "That's essentially a slush fund at this point," said Reed, D-Rhode Island. Trump's talk of building "the greatest dome of them all" seemed to originate on the campaign trail. After watching Israel's successful use of its Iron Dome, Trump's calls for a U.S. version was met with cheers from crowds at his rallies so much that Republicans included the construction of a U.S. missile shield in its party platform ahead of the 2024 elections. In January, Trump signed an executive order calling on Hegseth to make it happen. MORE: A timeline of the intensifying Israel-Hezbollah-Iran conflict "The threat of attack by ballistic, hypersonic, and cruise missiles, and other advanced aerial attacks, remains the most catastrophic threat facing the United States," Trump wrote in the Jan. 27 order. Since then, "the Defense Department has gathered the brightest minds and best technical talent available to review a full range of options that considers current U.S. missile defense technology and cutting-edge innovation to rapidly develop and field a dependable umbrella of protection for our homeland," Sean Parnell, chief Pentagon spokesman and Hegseth's senior adviser, said earlier this week amid reports the Defense Department has been working on the proposal. Still unclear is exactly how comprehensive the system would be. Also in question is whether such an ambitious program might siphon away money from other vital programs. The Air Force, for example, is in the process of replacing 400 of its intercontinental ballistic missiles built in the 1970s with new ones. MORE: Army expects to spend up to $45M for its 250th birthday celebration in DC "Some U.S. technology in space such as space-based sensors and air and missile defense exist today, but all of the systems comprising the Golden Dome architecture will need to be seamlessly integrated," Hegseth said in a statement. "Golden Dome will be fielded in phases, prioritizing defense where the threat is greatest." Trump's plan appears to be on the lower end of congressional cost estimates, but dramatically sooner than thought possible. Earlier this month, the Congressional Budget Office estimated the U.S. would need to spend anywhere from $161 billion to $542 billion over 20 years to develop and launch a network of space-based interceptors. According to the CBO, these cost estimates are lower than they would have been years ago because of a decline in the cost of available launch services. Trump unveils plans for $175B 'Golden Dome' missile defense shieldoriginally appeared onabcnews.go.com

Trump unveils plans for $175B 'Golden Dome' missile defense shield

Trump unveils plans for $175B 'Golden Dome' missile defense shield President Donald Trump on Tuesday unveiled plans to begin buildin...
Man United gets boost ahead of Europa League final against Tottenham as 3 players returnNew Foto - Man United gets boost ahead of Europa League final against Tottenham as 3 players return

BILBAO, Spain (AP) — Manchester United will have a trio of players back from injury for the Europa League final against Tottenham, coach Ruben Amorim said Tuesday, with Diogo Dalot, Leny Yoro and Joshua Zirkzee all available to come off the bench. All three players took part in training on Tuesday and could play at least a few minutes if needed. "Very good for us," Amorim said. "Of course, they are limited in the minutes for the game but they can help us win the game." Matthijs de Ligt will not be available but traveled to Bilbao to support his teammates. Lisandro Martinez is the only other first-team player not available as he remains out with a serious knee injury. The return of Zirkzee was the biggest surprise as he had initially been ruled out for the season because of a hamstring injury he picked up in April. "Me neither," Amorim said when told nobody expected the forward's return. "They recover quite well. They push, of course, and we have to respect the feeling of the player but we push a little bit, as they wanted to be part of the team. That is a very good sign." Dalot was nursing a calf injury since April, and Yoro had been out since earlier this month. United has had a dismal season but is hoping to finish it with a European title. The club is in 16th place in the league standings after 18 defeats, its most in a single campaign since the Premier League began in 1992. It is also certain to register itsworst-ever points totalin that era, as well as its lowest finish. Tottenham injuries Tottenham coach Ange Postecoglou said midfielder Lucas Bergvall has not recovered from an ankle injury in time for the final. He was with the squad in Bilbao but won't play. Midfielder Pape Sarr will be available despite not finishing the league match against Aston Villa on Friday because of a back issue. Tottenham is in 17th place in the Premier League, having lost 21 times — also a club record in the modern era. The Champions League runner-up in 2019, Tottenham is seeking its first trophy since the 2008 English League Cup. ___ AP soccer:https://apnews.com/hub/soccer

Man United gets boost ahead of Europa League final against Tottenham as 3 players return

Man United gets boost ahead of Europa League final against Tottenham as 3 players return BILBAO, Spain (AP) — Manchester United will have a ...
Giancarlo Stanton's Yankees return still uncertain, with no set date to begin rehab assignmentNew Foto - Giancarlo Stanton's Yankees return still uncertain, with no set date to begin rehab assignment

Giancarlo Stanton's return to theNew York Yankees' lineup is still an uncertainty. Manager Aaron Boone told reporters Saturday that the veteran slugger hasnot yet been scheduledto begin a minor-league rehab assignment. That was approximately 10 days after Stanton faced live batting practice for the first time since beingshut down during spring trainingdue totendinitis in both elbows. With Stanton not going through a typical spring training preparation for the 2025 season, a minor-league rehab assignment will likely be necessary. However, Boone said Stanton wouldn't require a long rehab in the minors (the maximum allowed for position playersis 20 days) because he doesn't play a defensive position. Stanton wastransferred to the 60-day injured liston May 1 to open up a spot on the Yankees' 40-man roster. That makes him eligible to be activated on May 24. However, the team projected thata mid-June returnis more likely after Stanton goes through a ramp-up process expected to take approximately two months. During spring training, Stanton left the Yankees' camp in Tampa to undergo medical tests by team doctors in New York. He also receivedtwo rounds of platelet-rich plasma injectionsin both elbows to try to accelerate the healing process. Surgery was viewed as a last resort because it would sideline Stanton for three months. Yet if the Yankees had known about Stanton's condition earlier in the offseason, the team might've encouraged that option. Instead, the team didn't know how serious Stanton's condition was until he informed them shortly before spring training, saying he hadn't swung a batfor three to four weeks. In Stanton's absence, the Yankees have gotten a collective .284 average (fourth in MLB) and .987 OPS (second in the league) from the DH spot, with 14 doubles, 15 home runs and 30 RBI.Ben Ricehas gotten most of the at-bats at DH, batting .250/.348/.529 with 10 doubles, 9 homers and 20 RBI. Rice took grounders at third basebefore Sunday's game, raising the question of whether he could move to another position, perhaps in anticipation of Stanton's return. However, Boone dismissed those notions, saying Rice was "just doing it for fun." The Yankees could use the help at third base, where their collective .203 average and .568 OPS at the position are near the bottom of MLB. Last season, Stanton batted .233 with a .773 OPS, 27 home runs, 20 doubles and 72 RBI in 114 games. He was very impactful in the postseason, hitting seven home runs with a 1.048 OPS. With four of those homers against theCleveland Guardians, Stanton was named ALCS MVP.

Giancarlo Stanton's Yankees return still uncertain, with no set date to begin rehab assignment

Giancarlo Stanton's Yankees return still uncertain, with no set date to begin rehab assignment Giancarlo Stanton's return to theNew ...
Trump pushes House GOP holdouts to get behind the massive bill for his agendaNew Foto - Trump pushes House GOP holdouts to get behind the massive bill for his agenda

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump traveled to Capitol Hill Tuesday morning to deliver a message to House Republicans impeding a massive bill for his domestic agenda: Stop fighting and get it done as soon as possible. In a closed-door meeting with rank-and-file Republicans in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, Trump took aim at a bloc of blue-state Republicans who've been pushing for a higher cap on the deduction their constituents can take for state and local taxes, known as SALT, while warning conservative hard-liners against steeper cuts to Medicaid. Trump's appearance at the Capitol came at a critical time for Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., who is aiming to steer the party-line, multitrillion-dollar bill through the narrowly divided House in the coming days. But key divisions lingered even after Trump's visit and it is not yet clear that Johnson has the votes to pass the bill. Standing alongside Johnson, Trump told reporters it was a "meeting of love." "Let me tell you, that was love in that room. There was no shouting. I think it was a meeting of love," Trump said. "I think we're going to get it done," he added. "I'm not losing patience. We're ahead of schedule." At a news conference after the meeting, Johnson called this moment the GOP's "best chance" to pass the bill. He can only spare three votes in the 220-213 Republican majority, with all Democrats expected to unify against the package. "We're on the verge of making history here, and everybody feels it in that room today with President Trump," Johnson, flanked by his leadership team, told reporters. "It was filled with standing ovations and high energy and high excitement, because everybody senses what's happening here." The package currently boosts the SALT cap to $30,000, up from the current $10,000 deduction. But pro-SALT Republicans have dismissed that figure as far too low. "Let it go," Trump told members of the so-called SALT Caucus, according to three lawmakers inside the meeting. While Trump directed his comments at all the lawmakers negotiating a higher SALT cap, Trump singled out moderate Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., who is eyeing a bid for governor in Trump's former home state. "End it, Mike, just end it," the president said, according to two of the lawmakers. (Notably, when Trumpendorsed Lawlerearlier this month for re-election to his battleground House seat, he touted the congressman's efforts to increase the SALT cap.) But after the meeting with Trump, some of the Republicans who have made a higher SALT cap essential to winning their votes said they still were not on board. "We need a little more SALT on the table to get to yes," said Rep. Nick LaLota, R-N.Y. "I hope the president's presence motivates my leadership to give us a number that we can go sell back home." "Right now, we're stalled," LaLota added. "You have folks fighting about SALT, on Medicaid, on SNAP, on deficits." The SALT Caucus Republicans are just one faction holding up the package, which seeks to extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts, boost funding for immigration enforcement and the military and cut spending elsewhere. It would also raise the debt limit. A handful of vocal members of the hard-right House Freedom Caucus are threatening to vote against the measure unless they secure deeper spending cuts. They've been pushing for new work requirements for Medicaid recipients to kick in sooner than the 2029 start date written in the current legislation, which House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., has said will move to early 2027. And conservatives are demanding a lower federal match to states for recipients added under the Obamacare expansion. But Trump told Republicans, "Don't f--- around with Medicaid," according to two lawmakers in the room. But Republicans appear unified around the Medicaid spending cuts and new rules, including the swing district members who are facing political attacks for going after the program. "Work requirements are generally popular, so I don't have a problem with that," said Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., one of a few GOP lawmakers who won in a district Trump lost last fall. Bacon said that "after the president talked today," he feels confident there won't be cuts to federal payments to states for Medicaid, as "the president made it pretty clear not to do it." Overall, Bacon said he's "a lean yes" on the emerging package. Rep. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., an anti-spending conservative, said he's still "undecided" on the legislation, saying he needs to see that the math will add up. "I'd just like to get the numbers," Burchett said in an interview, adding that while his colleagues continue to debate "Medicaid and the SALT stuff," he wants more evidence that the legislation is fiscally sound. Rep. Suzan DelBene, D-Wash., the party's campaign chair tasked with capturing the House majority next year, said Trump is "pushing Republicans off a cliff" by making them vote for the bill. "They're on record taking health care away from millions of people across the country and people in their districts. They're not standing up for the communities, they are just blindly following the president," DelBene said in an interview Tuesday. "And they're going to pay for that at the ballot box." Before the meeting, Trump, standing alongside Johnson, had harsh words for Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., a fiscal hawk who has opposed many of the president's initiatives, including the current package for his agenda, over deficit concerns. "I don't think Thomas Massie understands government. I think he's a grandstander. We don't even talk to him much. I think he should be voted out of office," Trump said. "If you ask him a couple of questions, he never gives you an answer. He just says, 'I'm a no.' He thinks he's going to get publicity." A senior White House official said Trump urged Republicans to "stick together" to pass what he has dubbed his "one big, beautiful bill." The president emphasized that the SALT issue should not halt the bill and that moderates can "fight for SALT later on," the official said. And Trump told Republicans not to touch Medicaid, except for tackling "waste, fraud and abuse," the official said. The official said Trump was supportive of the new work requirements provisions and removing undocumented immigrants from Medicaid. Johnson has set a self-imposed deadline of Memorial Day to pass the package through the House. The speaker told NBC News the legislation could come to the floor as soon as Wednesday night. But negotiators have not announced agreements on any of the outstanding issues, including SALT and Medicaid cuts. Trump described Tuesday's meeting as a "pep rally," and his appearance did move the needle for some. Conservative Rep. Paul Gosar, R-Ariz., a Freedom Caucus member, said he is on the fence on the bill. But he said "there's an outside chance" the Trump package can pass this week. "I wouldn't have said that until Trump came today," Gosar said.

Trump pushes House GOP holdouts to get behind the massive bill for his agenda

Trump pushes House GOP holdouts to get behind the massive bill for his agenda WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump traveled to Capitol Hill T...

 

GINGER MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com